<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 633 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals by way of remand, condoning the delay of 29 days in filing the appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the partner&#039;s medical condition and administrative duties. The impugned order dismissing the appeal without considering the merits was set aside, emphasizing the importance of a fair evaluation of the case. The matter was remanded back to the Commissioner for a decision on the merits, highlighting the significance of justifying delays in legal proceedings with relevant evidence and balancing procedural requirements with substantive merits for a comprehensive and just outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 633 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals by way of remand, condoning the delay of 29 days in filing the appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the partner&#039;s medical condition and administrative duties. The impugned order dismissing the appeal without considering the merits was set aside, emphasizing the importance of a fair evaluation of the case. The matter was remanded back to the Commissioner for a decision on the merits, highlighting the significance of justifying delays in legal proceedings with relevant evidence and balancing procedural requirements with substantive merits for a comprehensive and just outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>