<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 625 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126009</link>
    <description>Summi cream cement/Summi cement used in the manufacture of colour picture tubes were not accepted as capital goods or as spares, components or accessories of capital goods, but their admitted use in the manufacturing process brought them within the scope of inputs used in relation to manufacture. On that basis, Cenvat credit was held maintainable on the facts, and the departmental appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:16:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 625 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126009</link>
      <description>Summi cream cement/Summi cement used in the manufacture of colour picture tubes were not accepted as capital goods or as spares, components or accessories of capital goods, but their admitted use in the manufacturing process brought them within the scope of inputs used in relation to manufacture. On that basis, Cenvat credit was held maintainable on the facts, and the departmental appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>