<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 614 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125998</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of considering all submissions and providing a fair opportunity for the appellant to address discrepancies and defend their claim. The case was sent back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after taking into account all explanations provided by the appellant and ensuring a fair hearing process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:16:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 614 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125998</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of considering all submissions and providing a fair opportunity for the appellant to address discrepancies and defend their claim. The case was sent back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision after taking into account all explanations provided by the appellant and ensuring a fair hearing process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>