<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 608 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125992</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on PVC compound was held admissible where contemporaneous records such as stock ledger entries, RG-23A Part-I register, requisition-cum-issue slips and cheque payments evidenced receipt of inputs in the factory and their use in manufacture. Third-party statements denying supply were not enough to displace this documentary evidence, especially where no transporter evidence was produced and cross-examination was refused. The alleged closure of the original manufacturer, by itself, did not undermine the assessee&#039;s records. On that basis, the duty demand and penalties were found unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 08:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 608 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125992</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on PVC compound was held admissible where contemporaneous records such as stock ledger entries, RG-23A Part-I register, requisition-cum-issue slips and cheque payments evidenced receipt of inputs in the factory and their use in manufacture. Third-party statements denying supply were not enough to displace this documentary evidence, especially where no transporter evidence was produced and cross-examination was refused. The alleged closure of the original manufacturer, by itself, did not undermine the assessee&#039;s records. On that basis, the duty demand and penalties were found unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>