<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 714 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125990</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed an appeal due to a delay of 437 days in filing the appeal against the Order-in-Appeal by the CCE (Appeals), Bhopal. The appellant&#039;s reason for delay, seeking permission from its Head Office, was deemed insufficient. Additionally, the appeal, related to a Central Government Undertaking (BSNL), lacked clearance from the Committee of Disputes, rendering it time-barred and not maintainable. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural requirements for appeals from such undertakings, leading to the dismissal of both the application for condonation of delay and the appeal itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:34:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 714 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125990</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed an appeal due to a delay of 437 days in filing the appeal against the Order-in-Appeal by the CCE (Appeals), Bhopal. The appellant&#039;s reason for delay, seeking permission from its Head Office, was deemed insufficient. Additionally, the appeal, related to a Central Government Undertaking (BSNL), lacked clearance from the Committee of Disputes, rendering it time-barred and not maintainable. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural requirements for appeals from such undertakings, leading to the dismissal of both the application for condonation of delay and the appeal itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>