<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 697 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125972</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore allowed the appeals in a case concerning a dispute over a refund claim under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Revenue&#039;s concerns regarding non-satisfaction of refund conditions and errors in sanctioning were accepted by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Appellant argued for exclusion of job work clearance and claimed eligibility for refund based on export sales. The Tribunal supported the Appellant&#039;s arguments, emphasizing the need for a show cause notice for recovery of erroneous refunds. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:11:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 697 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125972</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore allowed the appeals in a case concerning a dispute over a refund claim under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Revenue&#039;s concerns regarding non-satisfaction of refund conditions and errors in sanctioning were accepted by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Appellant argued for exclusion of job work clearance and claimed eligibility for refund based on export sales. The Tribunal supported the Appellant&#039;s arguments, emphasizing the need for a show cause notice for recovery of erroneous refunds. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>