<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 696 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125971</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the order-in-appeal granting interest on delayed refund payment from 26-8-1995, based on the provisions of Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeal by the Revenue challenging this decision was dismissed, and the appellant was deemed entitled to interest for the delay in refund sanction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:07:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 696 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125971</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the order-in-appeal granting interest on delayed refund payment from 26-8-1995, based on the provisions of Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeal by the Revenue challenging this decision was dismissed, and the appellant was deemed entitled to interest for the delay in refund sanction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>