<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 574 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125957</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the order for recovery of irregularly availed Cenvat credit and penalties. The Tribunal held that the manufacturer was entitled to avail credit on the duty paid on inputs received, including duty on facility charges, as the supplier had discharged duty on those charges. The appeals were allowed, and the demand for Cenvat credit recovery and penalties was deemed unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:43:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 574 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125957</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the order for recovery of irregularly availed Cenvat credit and penalties. The Tribunal held that the manufacturer was entitled to avail credit on the duty paid on inputs received, including duty on facility charges, as the supplier had discharged duty on those charges. The appeals were allowed, and the demand for Cenvat credit recovery and penalties was deemed unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>