<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 559 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case for separate penalties on M/s. Aroma International for diverting duty-free goods, setting aside combined penalties. The penalty on M/s. Vishal Exports Overseas Ltd. was overturned, but upheld for its Director due to involvement in diverting goods. Shri Bhumish Shah&#039;s penalty was revoked as his role was limited. Shri Shammi Chanana&#039;s penalty was upheld for fraudulent export claims. Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for separate penalties on M/s. Aroma International, while appeals against other parties were dismissed. Appeals by Shri Pradeep S. Mehta and Shri Shammi Chanana were rejected, while those by M/s. Vishal Exports Overseas Ltd. and Shri Bhumish Shah were accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:31:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 559 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case for separate penalties on M/s. Aroma International for diverting duty-free goods, setting aside combined penalties. The penalty on M/s. Vishal Exports Overseas Ltd. was overturned, but upheld for its Director due to involvement in diverting goods. Shri Bhumish Shah&#039;s penalty was revoked as his role was limited. Shri Shammi Chanana&#039;s penalty was upheld for fraudulent export claims. Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for separate penalties on M/s. Aroma International, while appeals against other parties were dismissed. Appeals by Shri Pradeep S. Mehta and Shri Shammi Chanana were rejected, while those by M/s. Vishal Exports Overseas Ltd. and Shri Bhumish Shah were accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>