<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 554 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125949</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the rejection of a refund claim based on unjust enrichment in a case involving payments made during provisional assessments. The Tribunal upheld the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment, emphasizing the importance of demonstrating that the burden was not passed on to consumers and that denial of relief would result in a loss. The decision aligned with judicial precedents and statutory provisions, affirming that the doctrine of unjust enrichment applies in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:01:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 554 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125949</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the rejection of a refund claim based on unjust enrichment in a case involving payments made during provisional assessments. The Tribunal upheld the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment, emphasizing the importance of demonstrating that the burden was not passed on to consumers and that denial of relief would result in a loss. The decision aligned with judicial precedents and statutory provisions, affirming that the doctrine of unjust enrichment applies in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>