<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 597 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125943</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the Department before the Tribunal were rejected due to inadequate authorization, lack of proper reasoning for challenging the lower Appellate Authority&#039;s orders, and insufficient grounds for interference. The Tribunal found no valid reasons to overturn the impugned Orders, considering the defective authorization, minimal amount involved, and lack of merit for intervention. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:26:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 597 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125943</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the Department before the Tribunal were rejected due to inadequate authorization, lack of proper reasoning for challenging the lower Appellate Authority&#039;s orders, and insufficient grounds for interference. The Tribunal found no valid reasons to overturn the impugned Orders, considering the defective authorization, minimal amount involved, and lack of merit for intervention. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>