<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 442 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125938</link>
    <description>An ex parte order was recalled where the appellant showed sufficient cause for non-appearance and its written submissions had not been considered. In the rectification request, the Tribunal treated the absence of participation as material and found recall justified so that the appeal could be heard afresh. The appeal was restored to its original number.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:56:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 442 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125938</link>
      <description>An ex parte order was recalled where the appellant showed sufficient cause for non-appearance and its written submissions had not been considered. In the rectification request, the Tribunal treated the absence of participation as material and found recall justified so that the appeal could be heard afresh. The appeal was restored to its original number.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>