<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 612 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125920</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the limitation point, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant. The impugned order by the Commissioner was limited to reconsidering the limitation aspect, and thus the scope of the present appeal could not be expanded beyond that.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:40:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 612 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125920</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the limitation point, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant. The impugned order by the Commissioner was limited to reconsidering the limitation aspect, and thus the scope of the present appeal could not be expanded beyond that.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>