<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 611 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125919</link>
    <description>The Tribunal agreed with the appellant&#039;s position on the treatment of transportation up to branches as the place of removal under Section 4 for excise duty calculation. However, it disagreed with the appellant&#039;s stance on transportation directly from the factory to the dealer. The issue of limitation on the demand was left for final hearing, with the Tribunal directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 1 crore within eight weeks. The balance amount of duty and penalty was waived subject to this deposit, and recovery was stayed pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:39:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 611 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125919</link>
      <description>The Tribunal agreed with the appellant&#039;s position on the treatment of transportation up to branches as the place of removal under Section 4 for excise duty calculation. However, it disagreed with the appellant&#039;s stance on transportation directly from the factory to the dealer. The issue of limitation on the demand was left for final hearing, with the Tribunal directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 1 crore within eight weeks. The balance amount of duty and penalty was waived subject to this deposit, and recovery was stayed pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>