https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125906 The Tribunal admitted the appeal, condoning the 1242-day delay due to the appellant's history of seeking remedy against the adjudication order. The Tribunal directed a pre-deposit of Rs. 2 lakhs to stay the penalty, considering the appellant's confiscation of goods. The decision aimed to balance the parties' interests while upholding the law's majesty, emphasizing procedural diligence, fairness, and justice in the legal process. en-us Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:46:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125906 The Tribunal admitted the appeal, condoning the 1242-day delay due to the appellant's history of seeking remedy against the adjudication order. The Tribunal directed a pre-deposit of Rs. 2 lakhs to stay the penalty, considering the appellant's confiscation of goods. The decision aimed to balance the parties' interests while upholding the law's majesty, emphasizing procedural diligence, fairness, and justice in the legal process. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125906