<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 564 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125849</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to reject a refund claim for Central Excise duty on scrap, citing final assessment by the appellants and the doctrine of unjust enrichment. The appellants&#039; claim contradicted their own assessment and sought to benefit from decisions in other cases. The Tribunal found the duty paid on the scrap was recovered from customers, invoking unjust enrichment and disqualifying the refund claim. Emphasizing the principle of litigating individual disputes, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, highlighting the impermissibility of seeking refunds based on unrelated cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:46:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 564 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125849</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to reject a refund claim for Central Excise duty on scrap, citing final assessment by the appellants and the doctrine of unjust enrichment. The appellants&#039; claim contradicted their own assessment and sought to benefit from decisions in other cases. The Tribunal found the duty paid on the scrap was recovered from customers, invoking unjust enrichment and disqualifying the refund claim. Emphasizing the principle of litigating individual disputes, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, highlighting the impermissibility of seeking refunds based on unrelated cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>