<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 563 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125848</link>
    <description>Declared import value can be rejected only where cogent reasons bring the case within the recognised exceptions to the transaction-value rule. Reliance on a valuation circular and depreciation alone was insufficient, because the show-cause notice did not set out a satisfactory basis for discarding the value declared at import or for excluding Rule 4(1) treatment under Rule 4(2). Without a properly reasoned case and a meaningful opportunity to rebut it, revaluation of the goods could not be sustained, and the declared transaction value was required to be accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:39:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 563 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125848</link>
      <description>Declared import value can be rejected only where cogent reasons bring the case within the recognised exceptions to the transaction-value rule. Reliance on a valuation circular and depreciation alone was insufficient, because the show-cause notice did not set out a satisfactory basis for discarding the value declared at import or for excluding Rule 4(1) treatment under Rule 4(2). Without a properly reasoned case and a meaningful opportunity to rebut it, revaluation of the goods could not be sustained, and the declared transaction value was required to be accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>