<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 561 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125846</link>
    <description>The CESTAT, Bangalore, held that the Deputy Commissioner of Customs&#039; request to extend the Bank Guarantee validity period, despite a stay order, was against judicial discipline. The Tribunal directed that the Bank Guarantee need not be extended, and no recovery action should be taken until the appeal is decided. This decision underscores the importance of complying with Tribunal orders to ensure fair legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 561 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125846</link>
      <description>The CESTAT, Bangalore, held that the Deputy Commissioner of Customs&#039; request to extend the Bank Guarantee validity period, despite a stay order, was against judicial discipline. The Tribunal directed that the Bank Guarantee need not be extended, and no recovery action should be taken until the appeal is decided. This decision underscores the importance of complying with Tribunal orders to ensure fair legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>