<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 692 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellants based on the applicability of Section 23 for remission of duty on the damaged imported goods. The case highlighted the distinction between lost, destroyed, and damaged goods under the Customs Act, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling statutory conditions for duty remission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 692 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellants based on the applicability of Section 23 for remission of duty on the damaged imported goods. The case highlighted the distinction between lost, destroyed, and damaged goods under the Customs Act, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling statutory conditions for duty remission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>