<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 684 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the original adjudicating authority to determine the quantum of interest payable in accordance with the law. The appellants successfully argued for interest on the refund from the date of filing the claim in October 1998, emphasizing that the refund was due at that time. The Tribunal upheld the claim for interest, citing relevant decisions and stressing the importance of timely refund payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:32:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 684 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the original adjudicating authority to determine the quantum of interest payable in accordance with the law. The appellants successfully argued for interest on the refund from the date of filing the claim in October 1998, emphasizing that the refund was due at that time. The Tribunal upheld the claim for interest, citing relevant decisions and stressing the importance of timely refund payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>