<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 678 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125827</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery pending appeal to the appellants in a case concerning the demand of duty on capital goods installed in unregistered premises. Despite procedural non-compliance, the Tribunal considered the violation as technical, emphasizing the importance of following prescribed procedures for availing credits. The decision aimed at ensuring fairness in the appeal process, highlighting the need for compliance with Circulars and instructions issued by the CBEC. The Tribunal&#039;s order balanced the interests of both parties while allowing for a thorough examination of the case during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:54:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 678 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125827</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery pending appeal to the appellants in a case concerning the demand of duty on capital goods installed in unregistered premises. Despite procedural non-compliance, the Tribunal considered the violation as technical, emphasizing the importance of following prescribed procedures for availing credits. The decision aimed at ensuring fairness in the appeal process, highlighting the need for compliance with Circulars and instructions issued by the CBEC. The Tribunal&#039;s order balanced the interests of both parties while allowing for a thorough examination of the case during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>