https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125816 The Tribunal dismissed both appeals due to the appellant's failure to cooperate, abuse of the law, misuse of SSI exemption, clandestine removal of goods, and lack of evidence of independence from a controlling group. The appellant's dilatory tactics, common control with other concerns, and absence of supporting evidence led to the denial of SSI exemption benefits and relief from the adjudication order. The Tribunal proceeded with the appeal without further adjournment, ultimately upholding the adjudication order and providing no relief to the appellant. en-us Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:59:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125816 The Tribunal dismissed both appeals due to the appellant's failure to cooperate, abuse of the law, misuse of SSI exemption, clandestine removal of goods, and lack of evidence of independence from a controlling group. The appellant's dilatory tactics, common control with other concerns, and absence of supporting evidence led to the denial of SSI exemption benefits and relief from the adjudication order. The Tribunal proceeded with the appeal without further adjournment, ultimately upholding the adjudication order and providing no relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125816