<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 666 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125815</link>
    <description>The Tribunal referred the conflicting issue of denying CENVAT credit due to shortages in inputs as per invoices versus weighment slips to a Larger Bench for resolution. This decision aimed to address the contradictory rulings presented by both parties and provide clarity on the eligibility for credit in such situations. The matter was forwarded to the Hon&#039;ble President for the constitution of a Larger Bench to offer a comprehensive and authoritative resolution to the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:56:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 666 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125815</link>
      <description>The Tribunal referred the conflicting issue of denying CENVAT credit due to shortages in inputs as per invoices versus weighment slips to a Larger Bench for resolution. This decision aimed to address the contradictory rulings presented by both parties and provide clarity on the eligibility for credit in such situations. The matter was forwarded to the Hon&#039;ble President for the constitution of a Larger Bench to offer a comprehensive and authoritative resolution to the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>