<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 665 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125814</link>
    <description>Failure to prove proper service of the show-cause notices and personal hearing notices vitiated the adjudication, as the record did not contain acknowledgement of receipt and the hearing intimation was returned undelivered. The absence of evidence of due service supported the grievance of denial of natural justice, and the impugned orders were set aside. The matters were remanded for fresh adjudication after proper service of the show-cause notices and observance of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:53:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 665 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125814</link>
      <description>Failure to prove proper service of the show-cause notices and personal hearing notices vitiated the adjudication, as the record did not contain acknowledgement of receipt and the hearing intimation was returned undelivered. The absence of evidence of due service supported the grievance of denial of natural justice, and the impugned orders were set aside. The matters were remanded for fresh adjudication after proper service of the show-cause notices and observance of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>