https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125799 The Tribunal remanded the case involving jurisdiction disputes between the Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai, and the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Aurangabad. The Mumbai Commissioner's order was set aside, directing separate decisions for bills cleared in Mumbai and Aurangabad. Videocon Appliances Ltd. and the revenue challenged the classification and disputed duty amount, leading to remand for fair consideration by the respective adjudicating authorities. Concerns over lack of jurisdiction and denial of natural justice were addressed, with penalties under the Customs Act contested and all appeals allowed for thorough examination by the authorities. en-us Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:21:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125799 The Tribunal remanded the case involving jurisdiction disputes between the Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai, and the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Aurangabad. The Mumbai Commissioner's order was set aside, directing separate decisions for bills cleared in Mumbai and Aurangabad. Videocon Appliances Ltd. and the revenue challenged the classification and disputed duty amount, leading to remand for fair consideration by the respective adjudicating authorities. Concerns over lack of jurisdiction and denial of natural justice were addressed, with penalties under the Customs Act contested and all appeals allowed for thorough examination by the authorities. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125799