<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 636 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the ROM petition filed by the Revenue challenging the decision on excise duty evasion, penalties, confiscation of photocopiers, and redemption fine imposed on Copier Force India Ltd. The Tribunal upheld the evasion finding but set aside the demand and penalties due to lack of notice to front firms. It also affirmed the confiscation of photocopiers but deemed the redemption fine excessive, remanding the issue for fresh adjudication. The ROM petition was rejected as the Tribunal found the dummies created by CFI to evade duty required a hearing before being treated as such.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:01:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 636 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the ROM petition filed by the Revenue challenging the decision on excise duty evasion, penalties, confiscation of photocopiers, and redemption fine imposed on Copier Force India Ltd. The Tribunal upheld the evasion finding but set aside the demand and penalties due to lack of notice to front firms. It also affirmed the confiscation of photocopiers but deemed the redemption fine excessive, remanding the issue for fresh adjudication. The ROM petition was rejected as the Tribunal found the dummies created by CFI to evade duty required a hearing before being treated as such.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>