https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125767 The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to demonstrate how their goods could be considered as capital goods for Cenvat credit entitlement. Despite the pending Tribunal order, the adjudicating authority had already decided on the case. The Tribunal did not grant total waiver of pre-deposit, directing the appellant to make a specified pre-deposit to stay the realization of the balance demand inclusive of penalty. en-us Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:10:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125767 The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to demonstrate how their goods could be considered as capital goods for Cenvat credit entitlement. Despite the pending Tribunal order, the adjudicating authority had already decided on the case. The Tribunal did not grant total waiver of pre-deposit, directing the appellant to make a specified pre-deposit to stay the realization of the balance demand inclusive of penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125767