<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 612 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125761</link>
    <description>Liability that had crystallised and attained finality during the sole proprietor&#039;s lifetime could be recovered from the estate in the hands of the legal representative, so the objection to proceeding against the heir was rejected. On merits, the demand for duty, interest and penalty was sustained because the proprietor&#039;s inculpatory statement, shortage in statutory records, and the panchnama supported a finding of clandestine clearance. The firm and proprietor were treated as inseparable on the facts, and no basis was found to interfere with the appellate conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:34:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 612 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125761</link>
      <description>Liability that had crystallised and attained finality during the sole proprietor&#039;s lifetime could be recovered from the estate in the hands of the legal representative, so the objection to proceeding against the heir was rejected. On merits, the demand for duty, interest and penalty was sustained because the proprietor&#039;s inculpatory statement, shortage in statutory records, and the panchnama supported a finding of clandestine clearance. The firm and proprietor were treated as inseparable on the facts, and no basis was found to interfere with the appellate conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>