https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125757 Rectification was unavailable where the original adjudication order imposed penalty under Rule 25, even though Rule 26 was apparently intended, because no corrigendum had been issued to correct the order. In the absence of any correction in the record, the Tribunal found no apparent error in its earlier order that could be rectified. The rectification application was therefore rejected as not maintainable. en-us Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:26:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125757 Rectification was unavailable where the original adjudication order imposed penalty under Rule 25, even though Rule 26 was apparently intended, because no corrigendum had been issued to correct the order. In the absence of any correction in the record, the Tribunal found no apparent error in its earlier order that could be rectified. The rectification application was therefore rejected as not maintainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125757