<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 577 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125723</link>
    <description>When the department enforces bonds or bank guarantees after a duty demand has been set aside, the affected party is entitled to disclosure of the particulars of the securities invoked. Here, the Revenue adjusted refund amounts and enforced available bonds and bank guarantees, but the appellant disputed the manner of enforcement and the absence of disclosure. The request for details was found justified, and the original adjudicating authority was directed to furnish the particulars of the enforced securities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:44:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 577 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125723</link>
      <description>When the department enforces bonds or bank guarantees after a duty demand has been set aside, the affected party is entitled to disclosure of the particulars of the securities invoked. Here, the Revenue adjusted refund amounts and enforced available bonds and bank guarantees, but the appellant disputed the manner of enforcement and the absence of disclosure. The request for details was found justified, and the original adjudicating authority was directed to furnish the particulars of the enforced securities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>