https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125702 The case involved a dispute over the correct quantification of duty liability for the appellants related to the clearance of parts of tractors to sister units. The Tribunal remanded the case for re-quantification of duty based on a crucial cost verification report that was not considered by the Commissioner initially. The challenge to the levy of interest was deferred pending the determination of duty liability. The Commissioner was directed to reconsider the duty and related issues, providing the appellants with a fair opportunity to present their case. The appeal was allowed for remand due to the failure to consider important evidence in the initial decision. en-us Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:25:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125702 The case involved a dispute over the correct quantification of duty liability for the appellants related to the clearance of parts of tractors to sister units. The Tribunal remanded the case for re-quantification of duty based on a crucial cost verification report that was not considered by the Commissioner initially. The challenge to the levy of interest was deferred pending the determination of duty liability. The Commissioner was directed to reconsider the duty and related issues, providing the appellants with a fair opportunity to present their case. The appeal was allowed for remand due to the failure to consider important evidence in the initial decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125702