<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 548 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125694</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed two appeals due to the appellant&#039;s delay tactics, abuse of process of law, and lack of cooperation for expeditious disposal. The appellant repeatedly sought adjournments without valid reasons, causing significant delays in the proceedings since 2004. Despite being aware of the urgency of the appeal, the appellant failed to diligently pursue the matter involving substantial duty demand and penalties. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s actions unacceptable, leading to the dismissal of both appeals for non-cooperation and abuse of process of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:52:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 548 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125694</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed two appeals due to the appellant&#039;s delay tactics, abuse of process of law, and lack of cooperation for expeditious disposal. The appellant repeatedly sought adjournments without valid reasons, causing significant delays in the proceedings since 2004. Despite being aware of the urgency of the appeal, the appellant failed to diligently pursue the matter involving substantial duty demand and penalties. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s actions unacceptable, leading to the dismissal of both appeals for non-cooperation and abuse of process of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>