<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 545 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, ruling that the time limit under Section 11B does not apply to refunds from finalization of provisional assessments under Rule 9B. The assessing officer should automatically sanction refunds without requiring a formal claim from the assessee, as per Rule 9B. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected, emphasizing that the refund process is distinct from Section 11B requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:34:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 545 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, ruling that the time limit under Section 11B does not apply to refunds from finalization of provisional assessments under Rule 9B. The assessing officer should automatically sanction refunds without requiring a formal claim from the assessee, as per Rule 9B. The appeal by the Revenue was rejected, emphasizing that the refund process is distinct from Section 11B requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>