<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 570 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125690</link>
    <description>Differential-duty demand based on higher weights in transport consignment notes than in invoices was unsustainable where the consignment notes included packing materials and gift articles supplied to dealers. The appellate authority accepted evidence that dealers acknowledged receipt of the gift articles and that the transporter&#039;s notes reflected the weight of gunny bags, corrugated boxes and similar packing materials. On that factual basis, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the order setting aside the demand and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 570 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125690</link>
      <description>Differential-duty demand based on higher weights in transport consignment notes than in invoices was unsustainable where the consignment notes included packing materials and gift articles supplied to dealers. The appellate authority accepted evidence that dealers acknowledged receipt of the gift articles and that the transporter&#039;s notes reflected the weight of gunny bags, corrugated boxes and similar packing materials. On that factual basis, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the order setting aside the demand and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>