<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 555 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125674</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalties under Rule 25 for violation of Central Excise Rules by the Appellant, rejecting the argument that mens rea was necessary for penalty imposition. The Appellant&#039;s failure to comply with registration certificate amendments, production declarations, and account maintenance led to penalties being upheld, overturning the previous order setting them aside. A modified penalty and redemption fine were imposed to ensure justice was served, emphasizing that ignorance of the law is not an excuse for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 555 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125674</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalties under Rule 25 for violation of Central Excise Rules by the Appellant, rejecting the argument that mens rea was necessary for penalty imposition. The Appellant&#039;s failure to comply with registration certificate amendments, production declarations, and account maintenance led to penalties being upheld, overturning the previous order setting them aside. A modified penalty and redemption fine were imposed to ensure justice was served, emphasizing that ignorance of the law is not an excuse for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>