https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125672 The Tribunal upheld the duty payment as not absolving the Appellant from penalty and interest if clandestine removal is proven. The lack of evidence regarding clandestine removal led to the applicability of penalty and interest if proven. The Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside penalty and interest was found unsustainable, emphasizing the seriousness of the charge. The Revenue's appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of concrete evidence in allegations of clandestine removal to determine penalty and interest imposition. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:45:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125672 The Tribunal upheld the duty payment as not absolving the Appellant from penalty and interest if clandestine removal is proven. The lack of evidence regarding clandestine removal led to the applicability of penalty and interest if proven. The Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside penalty and interest was found unsustainable, emphasizing the seriousness of the charge. The Revenue's appeal was allowed, highlighting the importance of concrete evidence in allegations of clandestine removal to determine penalty and interest imposition. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125672