<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 545 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision rejecting refund claims based on unjust enrichment, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the authority to evaluate new evidence regarding the duty burden and unjust enrichment, ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice. The appeals were allowed for further consideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:28:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 545 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision rejecting refund claims based on unjust enrichment, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh assessment. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the authority to evaluate new evidence regarding the duty burden and unjust enrichment, ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice. The appeals were allowed for further consideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>