<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 543 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125666</link>
    <description>An ex parte dismissal for non-appearance was recalled and the appeal restored where counsel had arrived late after being held up in the High Court, and an identical issue had since been decided in the appellant&#039;s favour by the High Court but was not before the Tribunal earlier. The Tribunal found these circumstances sufficient to set aside the final order, restore the appeal to its original number, and list it for rehearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:54:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 543 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125666</link>
      <description>An ex parte dismissal for non-appearance was recalled and the appeal restored where counsel had arrived late after being held up in the High Court, and an identical issue had since been decided in the appellant&#039;s favour by the High Court but was not before the Tribunal earlier. The Tribunal found these circumstances sufficient to set aside the final order, restore the appeal to its original number, and list it for rehearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>