<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 527 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125650</link>
    <description>A genuine commercial discount reflected in correspondence could not be added back to the invoice price for customs valuation where the import was negotiated at arm&#039;s length. In the absence of evidence that the buyer and seller were related, that the transaction lacked arm&#039;s-length character, or that any extra-commercial consideration existed, the declared transaction value had to be accepted. The valuation rules permit rejection of transaction value only when a statutory ground is established, and a discount by itself is not sufficient to discard the invoice value. The customs valuation enhancement was therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:32:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 527 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125650</link>
      <description>A genuine commercial discount reflected in correspondence could not be added back to the invoice price for customs valuation where the import was negotiated at arm&#039;s length. In the absence of evidence that the buyer and seller were related, that the transaction lacked arm&#039;s-length character, or that any extra-commercial consideration existed, the declared transaction value had to be accepted. The valuation rules permit rejection of transaction value only when a statutory ground is established, and a discount by itself is not sufficient to discard the invoice value. The customs valuation enhancement was therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>