<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 835 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125637</link>
    <description>The Appellant challenged the seizure of watches and imposition of a penalty, along with the seizure of Indian currency, alleging smuggling. The Department suspected the watches to be smuggled and held the seized cash. The Appellant denied the smuggling allegations, arguing charges were baseless. The Tribunal ordered a stay on the penalty amount&#039;s realization pending further hearings to examine evidence thoroughly and ensure fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 11:26:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 835 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125637</link>
      <description>The Appellant challenged the seizure of watches and imposition of a penalty, along with the seizure of Indian currency, alleging smuggling. The Department suspected the watches to be smuggled and held the seized cash. The Appellant denied the smuggling allegations, arguing charges were baseless. The Tribunal ordered a stay on the penalty amount&#039;s realization pending further hearings to examine evidence thoroughly and ensure fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>