<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 833 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125635</link>
    <description>The case involved shortages of inputs leading to allegations of duty evasion. The appellants were found to have sold goods without issuing Central Excise invoices, resulting in a demand for duty payment. The Tribunal upheld the duty demand but reduced the penalty, confirming liability under Section 11A and ordering interest payment under Section 11AB. The decision emphasized the importance of proper accounting to avoid duty evasion allegations and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 11:10:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 833 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125635</link>
      <description>The case involved shortages of inputs leading to allegations of duty evasion. The appellants were found to have sold goods without issuing Central Excise invoices, resulting in a demand for duty payment. The Tribunal upheld the duty demand but reduced the penalty, confirming liability under Section 11A and ordering interest payment under Section 11AB. The decision emphasized the importance of proper accounting to avoid duty evasion allegations and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>