<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 662 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125617</link>
    <description>Predeposit of adjudged duty and penalties was waived where the vehicle had been cleared against a bank guarantee exceeding the adjudged dues and part payment had already been made. The Tribunal treated the remaining balance as lower than the security already furnished and found interim protection appropriate pending the appeal. Recovery of the balance duty and penalties was stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:20:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 662 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125617</link>
      <description>Predeposit of adjudged duty and penalties was waived where the vehicle had been cleared against a bank guarantee exceeding the adjudged dues and part payment had already been made. The Tribunal treated the remaining balance as lower than the security already furnished and found interim protection appropriate pending the appeal. Recovery of the balance duty and penalties was stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>