<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 729 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125564</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, AHMEDABAD addressed a disagreement between its members regarding an order. The appellant&#039;s contention of a factual error by one member was supported by evidence. The Tribunal ruled that a Review Application (ROM) cannot be filed until the order attains finality. The ROM application was dismissed due to the order&#039;s lack of finality, advising the appellant to rectify factual errors through a third member. The decision emphasized adherence to legal principles in ROM filings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:45:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 729 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125564</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, AHMEDABAD addressed a disagreement between its members regarding an order. The appellant&#039;s contention of a factual error by one member was supported by evidence. The Tribunal ruled that a Review Application (ROM) cannot be filed until the order attains finality. The ROM application was dismissed due to the order&#039;s lack of finality, advising the appellant to rectify factual errors through a third member. The decision emphasized adherence to legal principles in ROM filings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>