https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125563 The Tribunal held that the appeal was maintainable despite a delay in filing, as the order was not validly served on the applicant within the prescribed time frame. The applicant's efforts to obtain the order promptly after actual receipt were considered, leading to a waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty. The Tribunal ordered the Stay Application to be listed for hearing, citing precedents and emphasizing the importance of proper service of orders for appeal timelines. en-us Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:38:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125563 The Tribunal held that the appeal was maintainable despite a delay in filing, as the order was not validly served on the applicant within the prescribed time frame. The applicant's efforts to obtain the order promptly after actual receipt were considered, leading to a waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty. The Tribunal ordered the Stay Application to be listed for hearing, citing precedents and emphasizing the importance of proper service of orders for appeal timelines. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125563