<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 724 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125559</link>
    <description>Suspension of a CHA licence under Regulation 20(2) carries civil consequences and is quasi-judicial in nature. Even where immediate suspension is permissible in emergent circumstances, minimum fairness requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing, which may be provided after the decision. Applying the Larger Bench view on the pari materia earlier regulation, the analysis treats a post-decisional hearing as capable of satisfying natural justice in an urgent case, and regards contrary decisions as distinguishable. On that basis, the suspension was not sustained on the objection raised, and the matter was remitted for post-decisional hearing and fresh orders in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:27:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 724 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125559</link>
      <description>Suspension of a CHA licence under Regulation 20(2) carries civil consequences and is quasi-judicial in nature. Even where immediate suspension is permissible in emergent circumstances, minimum fairness requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing, which may be provided after the decision. Applying the Larger Bench view on the pari materia earlier regulation, the analysis treats a post-decisional hearing as capable of satisfying natural justice in an urgent case, and regards contrary decisions as distinguishable. On that basis, the suspension was not sustained on the objection raised, and the matter was remitted for post-decisional hearing and fresh orders in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>