<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 653 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125551</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to claim exemption under Notification No. 108/95 for goods supplied to a project financed by international organizations. Despite presenting a certificate indicating the purchase was for the project, the Tribunal ruled that merely clearing goods in the contractor&#039;s name did not meet the exemption criteria. The appellants were required to comply with the pre-deposit requirement within a specified period, emphasizing the importance of meeting the exemption criteria under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 653 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125551</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to claim exemption under Notification No. 108/95 for goods supplied to a project financed by international organizations. Despite presenting a certificate indicating the purchase was for the project, the Tribunal ruled that merely clearing goods in the contractor&#039;s name did not meet the exemption criteria. The appellants were required to comply with the pre-deposit requirement within a specified period, emphasizing the importance of meeting the exemption criteria under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>