<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 258 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125544</link>
    <description>A temporary appointee in a higher post may be reverted to the parent post on one month&#039;s notice where the appointment letter reserves that right, and no prior hearing is required when the reversion is a simple contractual reversion rather than deprivation of a vested right or punitive action. The Court also held that an order which is facially innocuous is not rendered stigmatic or punitive merely because the counter-affidavit refers to unsatisfactory performance as the administrative reason for reversion. Reduction in emoluments following reversion did not change the character of the order, and the writ petition failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:56:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 258 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125544</link>
      <description>A temporary appointee in a higher post may be reverted to the parent post on one month&#039;s notice where the appointment letter reserves that right, and no prior hearing is required when the reversion is a simple contractual reversion rather than deprivation of a vested right or punitive action. The Court also held that an order which is facially innocuous is not rendered stigmatic or punitive merely because the counter-affidavit refers to unsatisfactory performance as the administrative reason for reversion. Reduction in emoluments following reversion did not change the character of the order, and the writ petition failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>