<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 707 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125542</link>
    <description>Anti-dumping duty on imports made between expiry of a provisional notification and issuance of the final notification is treated as leviable under the statutory scheme of Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, with the Customs Act, 1962 applying to assessment, recovery, interest, appeals and related matters. In the interim-relief context, the appellant was required to show undue hardship and a stronger balance of convenience, but failed to produce sufficient material. As a result, waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were denied, and deposit of the full demanded anti-dumping duty was ordered before the appeal could proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 707 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125542</link>
      <description>Anti-dumping duty on imports made between expiry of a provisional notification and issuance of the final notification is treated as leviable under the statutory scheme of Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, with the Customs Act, 1962 applying to assessment, recovery, interest, appeals and related matters. In the interim-relief context, the appellant was required to show undue hardship and a stronger balance of convenience, but failed to produce sufficient material. As a result, waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were denied, and deposit of the full demanded anti-dumping duty was ordered before the appeal could proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>