https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125536 The tribunal denied the request to withdraw the vakalatnama due to lack of proper notice to the client. The appeal was disposed of as non-prosecuted because of the appellant's failure to provide necessary instructions to the advocate, highlighting the importance of communication between clients and advocates in legal proceedings. The decision emphasizes that withdrawal of vakalatnama requires proper notice and that non-prosecution of an appeal can result from a lack of client instructions. This case serves as a reminder of the responsibilities of both parties in legal matters and the consequences of non-communication or non-cooperation in the appellate process. en-us Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:15:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125536 The tribunal denied the request to withdraw the vakalatnama due to lack of proper notice to the client. The appeal was disposed of as non-prosecuted because of the appellant's failure to provide necessary instructions to the advocate, highlighting the importance of communication between clients and advocates in legal proceedings. The decision emphasizes that withdrawal of vakalatnama requires proper notice and that non-prosecution of an appeal can result from a lack of client instructions. This case serves as a reminder of the responsibilities of both parties in legal matters and the consequences of non-communication or non-cooperation in the appellate process. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125536