<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 933 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125521</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the restoration application due to a delay beyond the limitation period. The advocate failed to justify the delay or provide a separate application for condonation. The application lacked verification of facts and details about the advocate&#039;s failure to appear. The Tribunal emphasized the need to disclose reasons for delay and exercise discretion judiciously. Insufficient justification led to the dismissal, highlighting the importance of adhering to timelines, justifying delays, and verifying information in legal applications to maintain judicial integrity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 933 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125521</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the restoration application due to a delay beyond the limitation period. The advocate failed to justify the delay or provide a separate application for condonation. The application lacked verification of facts and details about the advocate&#039;s failure to appear. The Tribunal emphasized the need to disclose reasons for delay and exercise discretion judiciously. Insufficient justification led to the dismissal, highlighting the importance of adhering to timelines, justifying delays, and verifying information in legal applications to maintain judicial integrity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>